I will discuss how to get started with RStudio and R. The video is particularly useful for beginners.
Please install RStudio and R from the links below:
RStudio:
To download the scripts, see my GitHub page:
R:
#rstudio
#ggpubr
#statistics
source
So we live in a black hole. Well indeed, may be our observable universe is indeed captured in a black hole. But more importantly; perhaps also our Milky Way (like any other spiral galaxy) is in essence a black hole, more specific a 2D naked singularity representing our galactic plane, and inside this plane spacetime would be emergent only around stars, producing an overlapping conglomerate of spacetime bubbles stretching towards the outer spiral arms. The emergence of first stars would already cause ST beyond the event horizon so that makes sense. Why is a 2D naked singularity likely? because if spacetime is emergent inside galaxies then the area between spiral arms is nearly void of spacetime (since almost no stars), which suggest the outer galactic spiral arms are much closer to the galactic core in real spatial distance. This results in slower absolute rotation speeds then we observe so the erratic rotation curves are solved and no dark matter is needed. Viewed from the outside the same is true; our galactic core would be much closer then observed from the outside explaining why clusters of galaxies appear to have dark matter. Where instead we actually see a lack of spacetime inside a galaxy. Also in agreement with what these researchers say; the outward universe acceleration we appear to observe (actually we only observe redshift) would be an illusion indeed. So no dark energy needed either. So we solve BOTH dark energy and dark matter. In addition, if these researchers are right, spacetime outside our galaxy would be diffracted concave due to galactic curvature, But as it is actually convex, the result is we appear to live in flat spacetime. A kind of mirror correction. Another issue solved. As a last remark; we should not talk of a limit of energy density [J/V] but of a limit to specific energy (J/kg). This is similar to our speed limit of m/s (C) since in the subatomic world energy is grid and mass is clock (like Penrose correctly mentions). So this speed limit inside a blackhole would appear to us in spacetime terms as [J/kg=Nm/kg=m2/s2=gamma C2]. While we are at it; If inside a blackhole / subatomic world E is grid, M is clock and gamma C2 is speed then the motion formula becomes; E=MC2….sounds familiar? This is not an equivalence formula now is it? So indeed it would seem if we breach C we inverse dimensionally forming a black hole (ruled by the QP setup) and in reverse, breaching C2 in the subatomic world QP area will cause a collapse in the energy grid into a nice spacetime surrounding we are used to hovering around our Sun. But these setups would be alternating. QP is not limited tot only smaller dimensions. So indeed our researchers would be on to something,…
Can you make the dataset SEM.SAV available please?
Can you please share the dataset so that we can practice with you as you walk through?
Most useful video! Did everything you teach and it works just fine. Thanks and greetings from France.
Thankyou for giving all the directions from starting.
Rodriguez Jeffrey Lee Anthony Thomas Helen
Good video for me.
without dataset it is of no use
Thanks for this great tutorial.
Good video for R learners from scratch 👍