I don’t get democracy



What IS democracy??
Use code johnnyharris at the link below to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan:

Check out all my sources for this video here:

The word ‘democracy’ gets thrown around a lot, but everyone seems to mean something different when they say it. What IS democracy? What does it actually mean?

Explore V-Dem’s data here:

Join Newpress, our community-driven hub for creator journalism:

Special thanks to:
– Danielle Allen, Harvard University
– Elizabeth Anderson, University of Michigan
– Michael Coppedge, University of Notre Dame
– Archon Fung, Harvard Kennedy School
– Helena Rosenblatt Dhar, CUNY Graduate Center
– Alice Siu, Stanford University

MORE CHANNELS:
Check out my new channel with Max Fisher – The Bigger Picture:
Check out my channel with Christophe Haubursin – Tunnel Vision
Check out my channel with Sam Ellis – Search Party

Original music for this video was composed by Tom Fox.

Do you have an insider tip or unique information on a story? Do you have a suggestion for a story you want us to cover? Submit to the Tip Line:

— VIDEO CHAPTERS —
00:00 Intro
3:14 Electoral
14:11 Liberal
22:34 Egalitarian
26:00 Participatory
31:14 People are stupid
37:01 Deliberative
44:47 The Cube

About:
Johnny Harris is an Emmy-winning independent journalist and contributor to the New York Times. Based in Washington, DC, Harris reports on interesting trends and stories domestically and around the globe, publishing to his audience of over 5 million on Youtube. Harris produced and hosted the twice Emmy-nominated series Borders for Vox Media. His visual style blends motion graphics with cinematic videography to create content that explains complex issues in relatable ways.

– press –
NYTimes:
NYTimes:
Vox Borders:
NPR Planet Money:

– where to find me –
Instagram:
Tiktok:
Facebook:

source

46 Comments

  1. My six points for democracy:

    1) The people vote
    2) That vote matters
    3) That vote is cast without coercion
    4) Anyone within a broadly defined group can vote
    5) The result of that vote must be accepted by everyone
    6) You must have a way to determine a winner (plurality, majority, etc.)

    That's all democracy is in my eyes, everything beyond that gets into types of governance, rather than the concept of democracy.

  2. Democrat was originally an insult, the idea that the people could rule themselves laughably naive. Maybe it still is to many degrees and extents. It's under construction. Hurry up!

  3. Nordic model > other democracies. Knowledge is power and when most of the citizens are well educated and and think critically what they see and hear = No Trump or Putin as leader.

  4. It's really not that complicated: all you need for a democracy to exist is free & fair elections… all those other elements might make it "better", but at the end of the day the are not requirements of a democracy.

  5. Democracy is not elections! That's why we are ruled by oligarchy! Sure it includes them but you cant have democracy only via elections. 6th century Athenians protected democracy from oligarch wealth and power through sortition and citizen juries and citizen assemblies and mini public consultations. Sortition is lottery! By an actual authentic crossection of the public. We can pay these representatives child care and a wage while they are helping with direct decision making and or policy decisions, for a cycle and negotiate time out of their employment. It is evidence based that the public make good decisions. Participation is everything in democracy! Civic Education is mandatory and so should voting be. Australia uses mandatory and preferential voting system much higher than first past post which is ineffective.

    Free press and media independent of corporations. Free market capitalism is so deregulated that it is consuming itself and all else!

    Thanks for explaining Liberal democracy and egalitarian democracy. And deeper into practical applications deliberative democracy citizen assemblies.

    So long as there are class/ caste systems democracy is moot!

  6. The biggest problem that is currently killing the most people is 'how do we determine the geographic areas where the decisions made democratically are enforced'.

    If I have a carpooling group where we decide where to go to lunch, and we swing back and forth between restaurant 1 and 2, but then we get more people in the group who prefer restaurants 3 and 4 because the larger group results in an economy of scale to save gas. But the result is that only restaurants 1 and 4 ever get chosen as the compromise, and the people who prefer restaurants 2 and 3 have suboptimal results. And if restaurant 2 and 3 ever did get what they want, they would be harming the most people by going against the majority preference. And maximizing harm for the most people is the exact opposite of the moral claim to democracy's existence and what the process is supposed to achieve.

    In the example, the people who prefer restaurants 2 and 3 can just leave the group and make choices that suit their preferences to maximize the good for themselves even if more gas gets used by splitting off in another car. But in real government wars have been fought because groups tried to split off to do their own thing, forcing people like in groups 2 and 3 into suboptimal conditions.

  7. For a country to be a democracy, I think the only reasonable metric would be to measure how government aligns with the opinions of people. That can happen in multiple ways, it doesn't have to be the traditional western electoral democracy. In fact, I would argue that by that measure many western "democracies" are not actually democracies. This was actually measured by Princeton University in 2014, they found how much policy correlates with public opinion in the US, and to no ones surprise, the correlation was negligible. What was highly correlated however was policy and the opinions of the very wealthy. So is the US a democracy? On what grounds? That you get to vote out the guy who's not doing what the public wants for another guy who doesn't do what the public wants? To me, it seems to act more like a vent, to channel frustration against the "other guy" rather than against the system.

  8. Democracy is very effective at local scale, the issue is when you scale it up to a country. Federal government was never meant to be this powerful when America started.

  9. It’s a buzzword. It’s used because we know what we’ve been told, and that is a word that is considered “good”.
    In truth, democracy gives power to majority rule, completely making the minority opinion disregarded. If the general consensus is one thing, objectively right or wrong, it becomes the “right”.
    This is where propaganda (aka, the media) finds it incredibly important to portray THEIR opinion as the majority’s opinion. It’s why having a parliament (a group of minority parties ruling) CANNOT work in a true democracy, because nobody is the majority.

  10. Bro, is this fucking adult Dora, walking your audience through fake discovery like they're a kid who can't handle being told the answer? You're pulling apophenia by design, engineering the audience into "finding" a conclusion you already had before the camera turned on.

    I know exactly what psychology this is. Earned Dogmatism Effect: audiences forgive certainty from an "explorer" that they'd reject from an expert, because experts are assumed to have "earned" the right to be closed minded, and closed minded reads as biased. Columbo effect: appearing naive and unthreatening lowers people's guard faster than competence does. Peripheral route persuasion: when you don't come off as an authority, people stop scrutinizing your argument and just vibe with you instead.

    And in your case it's not even hypothetical. You read an advance copy of Klaus Schwab's Stakeholder Capitalism before the public did, then pitched the World Economic Forum, the same institution Schwab founded, to sponsor "How China Became So Powerful." They paid you. You then performed a "curious guy finding this out live" journey that landed exactly where the book you'd already read wanted you to land, timed to launch alongside WEF's own Davos Agenda PR push, without the paid promotion disclosure YouTube's terms require.

    That's not naivety selling a worldview better than expertise. That's a paid spokesman wearing a naivety costume, using the psychology of trust in curious amateurs to smuggle a client's argument past an audience who thought they were watching someone figure it out in real time.

  11. Life is not business because no fish asked to be eaten even if it’s the strongest the big blue whale still able to eat em. Why search for the meaning of life instead of living it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might like

© 2026 Cantinho do Vídeo - WordPress Video Theme by WPEnjoy