That beautiful football shot isn’t 8k



People are obsessed with this BEAUTIFUL camera shot in football – but they’re wrong about what makes it so good. They think it’s 8k when really it’s broadcast embracing a tool that YouTubers have been using for years: bokeh.

Here’s some fun tech trivia for your Super Bowl weekend!

If you enjoyed this video, I think you might like this longer one too:

Subscribe to support us!

#shorts #football #SuperBowl #superbowl2023 #NFL #tech

source

48 Comments

  1. Also as someone who works in broadcasting, barely anything you see on your TV is actually 8k, 4k or even 2k.

    In order for everyone to truly experience a higher resolution broadcasted unto their TV, it has to be shot in 8k, then the infrastructure has to be able to send 8k to the distributor which is often a bigger national network like (im not American) but I believe things like Comcast or Verizon. Then your TV also needs to be able to actually display it as 8k.

    Fun fact, tv broadcasting is still in the process of fully updating to 1080 as it is. Even to this day and age the network I work for only just managed to upgrade 1 of their 2 channels to be 1080p and the other is still in 720p. Main reason is that it costs a LOT more bandwith when you go higher and that's often the threshold to keeping it lower.

  2. I did some photography about 45 years ago and used the F-stop settings to manipulate the clarity of the background all the time, and photographers for many decades before me did it, too. In fact, I saw a photo from the 19th century where the photographer (I think it was a woman) had done that. Not new at all.

  3. I dont understand, the shot at the end is clearly higher quality than at the beginning. You can see details in her skin and hair that arent in the earlier shots. Its not JUST a blurry background, even if that does make it look cinematic. The in-focus part is absolutely more detailed

  4. Totally mind-blowing that anyone could look at those shots and think the aesthetic of the shot has anything to do with the camera resolution. I was genuinely confused when you started explaining something so obvious.

  5. YouTube does ruin the quality a bit, on WiFi YouTube defaults to 1080p HD and 60 FPS. Why it really looks so good is the amazing camera work, color correction, and the out of focus backgrounds (bokeh blur)

  6. Missing an important part. Because of the blurred background, there is less compression happening on the main subject which actually does increase the "resolution" of the object in focus. Its the same principle as to why image quality degrades when there is lots going on during a scene (Ie. Confetti dropping) but opposite

  7. Yes but the drawback is it's harder to keep moving objects in focus due to the lack of depth of field. Ask an NFL Films cameraman who used to shoot 16mm and now shoots Arri Alexas and Amiras how much harder it is to follow a CU shot of the ball in the air.

  8. I think they are increasing the aperture(well, actually, the number goes down) and decreasing the isos and increasing the shutter speed so that the pictures come out less blurry and decreases the depth of field.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might like

© 2026 Cantinho do Vídeo - WordPress Video Theme by WPEnjoy