Episode #24
The Candace Owens vs Andrew Wilson debate is tomorrow, moderated by Patrick Bet-David.
In this video:
• Candace’s latest X updates (she skipped her show to prep)
• Andrew’s GiveSendGo status (~$60k)
• Baron Coleman on the new defense filing
• Officer Tatum’s response to the parking garage footage
• Lance Twiggs identification issues
Full pre-debate rundown.
⏱️ CHAPTERS / TIMESTAMPS ⏱️
0:00 Intro – Debate is tomorrow
1:00 Candace X updates
3:00 Andrew’s GiveSendGo update
5:20 Candace on Andrew’s background claims
6:30 Why Candace skipped her show
11:40 Baron Coleman on the new filing
17:30 Officer Tatum responds
20:40 Lance Twiggs identification
23:20 Final thoughts on the debate
#JPTruthProbe #CandaceOwens #AndrewWilson #TheGreatDebate
source
How do you think the debate will go tomorrow?
Food fight or actual substance?
Drop your predictions below 👇
#JPTruthProbe
Ahh the great griftwar of 2026 is today! Have fun!
Candace will win, of course. He's way too foul.
Andrew Wilson is going to win because the debate topic is unwinnable. If the debate topic was "does the evidence against Tyler Robinson surpass the beyond reasonable doubt standard?" then Candace would win.
But because she conceded to Andrew's terms she's going to lose and it's going to be embarrassing. Not to mention a complete headache to watch him filibuster with rhetorical and semantical nonsense for 3 hours long.
Something about Lance T situation bothers me alot. Why was he granted immunity almost immiadiately? That's very strange. And apparently he will not be called in to testify in court. Really, really strange. After all, he is the main source of hearsay evidence in this case!
I suspect Andrew's side will claim victory no matter what. Their hatred towards Candace is so intense that it clouds their common sense. I was hoping she would just ignore it, but can understand it's not in her DNA to resist a challenge😅
Thank God I got to see at least one video of someone being reasonable objective about this issue.
US courts always have clear photos (if it was submitted) to identify and send someone in prison, esp. in death penalty cases. If people accuse one legal side of cheating on the source of the photos and by AI content, software modifications, this case could not recover from mistakes and fraud.
I believe no one must be on one side until the public hears the government's theory (yes, every criminal case must be treated as a theory) and the defense responds. After the end, let the chips fall as they may.
50,000 came from one person lol
Candace and the TRUTH SEEKERS will win against the narrative pushing scumbags
What a stupid question to ask.We all know the truth…and that's what we shall still hear from Candace tomorrow.
Team Candace of course anything else would be uncivilized lol
🍿 🍿🍿
See, the last video I watched of yours you stated he was snide, arrogant, and mean. But Candace is just joking around by looking down on him?
I see your bias and already know where your opinions lie in regards to the debates.
It's fine to have different opinions, but when you MAKE CLAIMS that ENDANGER or CROSSHAIR people, you should have evidence to BACK THOSE CLAIMS.
Pre-Trial doesn't NEED to get lawyered up and rehearsed as it's not a trial.
Bottom line – they got his car, his plate and him on multiple cameras.
Im ready for the debate! Should be interesting!