Democrats win Senate: How upsets in Iowa, Kansas changed the map



Democrats are projected to take control of the U.S. Senate in the 2026 midterm elections, according to election projections reported by FOX 9 from Fox News and the Associated Press.

#politics #midterms #election #election2026 #2026election

source

47 Comments

  1. Does anyone besides me think it is SO ODD that so many 'mail in ballots' were requested? And those mail in ballots are majority democrat votes? Is this once again being stolen by democrats while republicans still try to play by the rules?

  2. The unprecedented level of corruption (most corrupt regime ever & trying to block, attacking all efforts to completely release Epstein files, seemingly only really helping multimillionaires & billionaires, …) and the Economy (illegal war & killings and helped by an enabling congress, who seems to be off & away more than they’re present) are the hallmarks of this presidency. Trump’s lousy character (megalomaniac, narcissist, embellisher/BSer, hypocrite, little ethics or morals, etc…) and buddying up with autocrats & dictators while turning against historical allies & friends obviously don’t help either. Delusional Don, Don the Con, the Donfather, the Donvict, Grifter in Chief, Thief in Chief, Commander in cheat, Out of touch Don, & Never done wrong Don. Maybe it’s because he’s always been kind of a spoiled privileged child.

  3. Nothing sinks in without a fight between a divided nation. We’re at least looking at another U.S. civil war. Only this time it isn’t North and South. It’s Right versus Left AND the bullets and the bombs are sure to come flying from every direction. Talk about U.S. self destructing. We are a violent nation after all.

  4. My political stance in Jesus (not republican and not democrat .. just Jesus and always will be just Jesus. Maybe blue will be what's better for now. I'm not even upset about the midterm.. I iust hope America DID do the right thing.. I guess we'll see! 😎

  5. It’s insane how nearly all states still voted 40+% republican. Guess gas and grocery prices aren’t high enough to knock some sense into people

  6. Sad to see America going down the drain.
    We abandoned God, now we are all delusional democrats who distroy our own nation.
    Time to leave America before ww3 starts.

  7. I don’t want Schumer, Jeffries, or Booker as House Speaker. These men are willing pawns for violent regimes bombing civilians and billionaires stripping the quality of life away from hard working American people.

  8. Numerous laws were violated, and a substantial amount of money was stolen. We must conduct an investigation. We can pursue multiple priorities simultaneously. Accordingly, Republicans should prepare for a challenging period ahead.

  9. TESTING WEATHER THE MID-TERM ELECTIONS SHOW ANOMALIES…. READ AND IMPLEMENT – don't be lazy DO IT

    November 5, 2026
    To rigorously test and uncover whether voting patterns or precinct-level anomalies stem from systemic irregularities rather than normal, fraud-free democratic behavior, statisticians, election data scientists, and bipartisan auditors SHOULD FOLLOW a strict, multi-step investigative methodology.

    Because standard statistical models (like Benford's Law or basic ttt-tests) frequently throw false positives due to demographic clustering or administrative reporting batches, a proper investigation moves well beyond a single formula. Here is the standard, accepted procedure used to analyze and verify election data integrity:

    Phase 1: Establish a Robust Baseline & Model Controls
    Before flagging any data point as an "anomaly," analysts SHOULD ensure the statistical baseline accounts for real-world human behavior rather than generic mathematical expectations.

    Accounting for Demographic Sorting: Instead of assuming all precincts should behave uniformly, models must control for known variables—such as historical voting patterns, socio-economic factors, age distribution, and party registration splits.
    Factoring in Voting Methods (The Dual-Track Problem): Because in-person voters and mail-in/absentee voters often skew heavily toward different political parties or timelines, models must evaluate these streams separately rather than blending them into a single aggregate pool.
    Standardizing Precinct Sizes: Recognizing that precinct sizes vary, analysts SHOULD apply variance-stabilizing transformations or hierarchical modeling to prevent smaller, highly volatile precincts from being mislabeled as extreme outliers.

    Phase 2: Hypothesis Testing and Anomaly Isolation
    Once a controlled baseline is established, advanced statistical tests are applied to pinpoint true statistical departures:

    Multivariate Regression & Residual Analysis: Instead of looking at simple vote counts, analysts SHOULD use multi-variable regression to predict expected vote shares based on demographics. The residuals (the difference between what the model predicted and what actually happened) are then mapped.
    Spatial Autocorrelation (Getis-Ord Gi or Moran’s I):* These tests check whether anomalies are randomly distributed or geographically clustered. Real demographic shifts usually show spatial continuity (neighboring precincts share similar traits), whereas sudden, isolated spikes often warrant closer administrative review.

    Phase 3: Administrative and Logistical Reconciliation
    When a precinct or batch of votes registers a high ttt-statistic or significant deviation, investigators SHOULD immediately check administrative records before jumping to conclusions about fraud:

    Reporting Batch Audits: Analysts SHOULD cross-reference sudden shifts in the running tally with county reporting logs to see if a late-night "dump" was simply a batch of mail-in ballots or a specific county reporting hub updating its database all at once.
    Poll Book and Sign-In Reconciliation: Investigators SHOULD examine the total number of ballots cast against the number of checked-in voters in the poll books to ensure no physical ballot box stuffing or clerical over-issuance occurred.

    Phase 4: Empirical, Physical Verification (The Gold Standard)
    Statistical flags can only ever point an investigator toward a place to look; they cannot prove fraud on their own. The definitive procedure always requires moving from digital data to physical evidence:

    Risk-Limiting Audits (RLAs): Election officials conduct RLAs, which use statistical sampling to review physical paper ballots proportional to the margin of victory. If an anomaly is flagged in a specific jurisdiction, the RLA sample size in that area can be adjusted to ensure high confidence.
    Full Hand Recounts: In close races or instances where machine tallies face widespread distrust, bipartisan teams manually recount physical paper ballots. Because human eyes read voter intent directly from the paper trail, hand recounts clear up machine calibration errors, reporting glitches, or batch upload discrepancies.
    Chain of Custody Verification: Bipartisan boards review physical security logs, tamper-evident seal numbers, transport logs, and signature verification records to guarantee that every physical ballot came from a qualified, registered voter.

    Summary
    In professional election forensics, a statistical flag (ttt-score, outlier, or residual) is merely an exploratory tool—the statistical equivalent of a smoke detector. Uncovering whether an irregularity is a sign of a real problem requires systematically stripping away demographic and administrative confounders, and then verifying the findings against the ultimate source of truth: the physical paper ballot trail.

  10. American are so dumb that every president and mid term you guys go 100% republican and the. 100% democrats 😅 that you guys want real results so fast that because you are not getting them within a year 😂 you switch sides that neither democrats or Republicans can even execute there plan.

    If democrats stay in office u probably get ubi, better taxs on the rich and housing construction. But get way more illegals.

    Republican if trump had more time he would of tooken over more land like he did in Venezuela and u.s would be been the buggest owner of oil and other materials, he would stop big business from buying private home market and kick more illegals out….

    Both way would fix the housing market. 1 will secure america power in the long run in return making the poor more poor but make ur dollar worth more so be worth it. Democrats would made you globally weaker but you guys would be more poorer but have more income and betger health care possible either way.

    You both be more" poorer"

    Republicans make the dollar stronger.

    Democrats will give you more dollars in general.

    You get better housing

    Republicans make it where big business cant jump in and less illegals so less competition

    Democrats will just make it cheaper to build more houses.. so be more supply same competition

    😂😂😂😂 you guys are bith dumb tyey both work with the same conclusion 😂😂

  11. Thanks to mail in ballots and no voter id. Because if you want to make sure that only American citizens can vote and that the votes are counted fairly, you're racist.

  12. Question is, will his donors and enablers, be his counsel? He has never paid any attorney, because his attorneys have represented him for free, with the assurance, he will pack their pockets.. now what?

  13. hey….just remember the words of Obama in his last year in the WH. He said….dont forget, I have the pen and a phone. aint no one getting out of this one alive….it's a big old s**t samich and we are all gone have to take a big ol bite.

  14. According to what I'm reading in news Australia, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, & Florida are still GOP. 😉

  15. This isn't about Democrats or Republicans. It's about making democracy work. Why not synchronize presidential and congressional elections every three years, eliminating midterm disruptions? Give elected administrations the opportunity to implement their programmes, maintain constitutional checks and balances, and let voters judge the results at the end of the term. The same principle should apply regardless of which party wins. Democracy should be about accountability and effective governance, not endless political tribalism.

  16. Just to make things clear, it would be an outlier if they didn't take control. Only 3 times in history has a sitting president retained the house and senate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might like

© 2026 Cantinho do Vídeo - WordPress Video Theme by WPEnjoy